We've discussed transnational capital, the British Empire. We've also discussed the Sabatine Frankets. Today we will put the two ideas together and show how the alliance between these two different forces have created modernity or the ideas that underpin our society today including Marxism, Darwinism, individualism, liberalism and Freudian psychology. All right. So, we will talk a lot about Jews today, but just as a caveat, it's important for us to remember that it's easy to see a Jewish conspiracy everywhere.
But things are actually much more complicated than that. The argument I want to make you to you today is that the Jews are construct and tool of empire. In other words, they're really the middle managers. to the ones who helped manage the empire. And if the Jews weren't around, then it would be the Indians or some other group.
An empire needs scapegoats. It needs middle managers. And for the past few years, the Jews have served the purpose. Something else I will show you today is that the empire, which is transnational capital, they all the profit. They hide behind the scenes.
They're the shadows and they make all the money. And it's really the Jews get all the blame. And what we'll discuss next class is that this is the same thing that will happen today. Okay. So that's the argument I will make to you today.
All right. So let's discuss the British Empire. The British Empire is unique in human history in that it controls the entire world. Um and it's just a small island, right? It's a small island with very little resources and it's able to control the entire world because it controls global trade.
It has the world's greatest navy. It also it also has a bank of England which is really transnational capital and English becomes the uh lingua frana of the world and has colonies throughout the world as well. So for the British Empire the way they control the world it's a very simple concept. As long as the British Empire is able to control the seaways, then it controls the world. The great crisis, the great problem, great threat is that a empire will emerge within the Eurasian continent.
It's called the heartland. Okay? And this could be Germany, it could be Russia, it could be China. But if it's able to emerge eventually like the mong like the Mongol Empire, it's able to conquer the entire Eurasian continent and through railways it's able to link up Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Asia all together into one trading block and then you don't need the seaways anymore. If that were to happen then the British Empire would go bankrupt because remember the British Empire with the Bank of England transational capital it's really a Ponzi scheme.
It be it needs people to keep on buying into the empire for it to continue to succeed. So the greatest threat is a great power emerging the heartland and throughout history that was either the French, the Ottoman Empire, the Germans or the Russians. So the grand strategy of the British is to create as much chaos and conflict in Europe as much as possible. You always want your enemies fight each other. Okay.
And that's just the core strategy of the British. Not very hard. Okay. Um so again as we discussed there are four major enemies that the British have faced throughout their uh uh history as an empire. The French they able to defeat because of the French Revolution as well as the Nepolic wars.
Uh then they had to face the Russians and the Russians were the greatest threat because the Russians had the largest land empire and they were the most likely to unify the Asian continent. uh they also face the Ottomans and they also face the Germans. Now the British could not um seem as though they were interfering in European politics because that all that would do is anger the Europeans and youite the Europeans against the British. They had to do it using sub foods secretly using intelligence operatives, right? And so of course what happened was that um they develop different strategies in order to divide and conquer Europe.
Uh what they would do is promote revolutionary movements um using transnational capital and we'll discuss these revolution movements later on. They also industrialize Japan because they saw Japan as a natural ally in u in the world. Okay. So you know that in Japan they underwent the Maji restoration and in only a few decades they were able to industrialize so much so that they defeated Russia in the RussoJapanese war in 1905 and you may not know this but capital the British and Americans finance a great deal of Japan's industrialization because Anglo-American Empire wanted Japan as an ally. Okay, it was a natural ally.
Um what they would also do is establish resource colonies. So Australia, New Zealand, Canada, these South Africa, these are all resource colonies. The idea is that you can now use manpower to fund your armies. Okay. And uh the last strategy is to wherever you can steal as much resources as possible as fast as you can.
And this was true in India and China and Africa as well. Okay. So this is the grand strategy of the British. and they needed agents to help them in these endeavors. And the 17 Frankas made the most sense, right?
Um so the advantages that 17 fra empire were four-fold. The first is that they already had a diaspora, right? And so and they were also um crypto Jews. They also disguise identity as Jews as well. So they were able as a network to conduct intelligence, do blackmail and subvert governments.
Okay. They also had access to a lot of transnational capital. They themselves were extremely wealthy. The last uh major advantage and the most important is that they had revolutionary cells and networks. Okay.
So remember Frankus they believe that they were saving the world. They believed they had to destroy the world in order to save it. And these made perfect revolutionaries. And I'll show you this as we move on. Okay.
Now, the last reason that we won't discuss much today, but we'll focus a lot on in our last class is the idea of esquetology where the rich empire they are um Christians and they believe that they must use Jews as as a pawn in order to force the return of Jesus. This we'll discuss a great deal next class, but I want I want to focus on these three reasons first. Okay. All right. Um, so and it made sense for the British to align themselves with the 17 Frankus because the way they saw the world was the same.
Okay. As an empire, as transnational capital, remember, you're focused on extracting as much energy as possible from your workers. So, you're very materialistic. Well, the Franks were also very materialistic as well, right? They believe that the body was more important than the spirit.
Second is that the both the Frankus and the British they wanted to obtain power through chaos, instability and regime change and both were very focused on the pursuit of wealth and power. So these were natural allies. Sorry. All right. So let's use an example of how the Art Empire sorry.
Let's use an example of how the British Empire worked this afternoon. And the most obvious example is the Ottoman Empire. So for the longest time the Ottoman Empire was the most powerful force in in Eurasia. And [snorts] this was the Ottoman Empire at its height in 1683. Remember 1666 is when somebody Zevi declared himself the Messiah.
And remember that Zeb Zevi have to convert to Islam and the people who follow him into Islam are called the Dome. Okay, the Dome are very important people. Um, but over time empires will decay. In 1853, Russia attacked the Art Oman Empire and this led to the Crimean War. The British and the French feared Russian expansionism and so they support the Ottomans and uh the Ottomans were able to defend themselves against the Russians.
But this alliance came at a cost to the Ottomans. The British and the French made the Ottomans seek out loans in order to finance the war. And over time because of interest they loan these loans start to overwhelm the Ottoman financial system. And so what happened was the British and the French bankers came and established their own tax administration. And so from now on, a third of all revenue, tax revenue that the Ottoman Empire generated would go directly to the French and British bankers.
Okay? And so this caused the Ottoman Empire to decline rapidly over time. And uh the French and the British, they set a central bank controlled by foreigners. And not only that, but they set their own tax administration. So they they had their own tax agents and that's why these bankers became very wealthy.
Guess what? These bankers had a natural ally in a domain, right? The Sabine Frankus. Um, and so these Sabine Franks also became very wealthy. Now, what happened is that the Ottoman Sultan didn't really like this relationship.
He didn't like being bossed around by these bankers. And so, he went to the Germans. And so, now the Germans were now financing Ottoman Empire. And they were now allies. And so, the British and the French didn't like this.
And so what the do was start to finance a revolutionary group called the young Turks. The young Turks believed in three things. They believed in secularism, no religion. They believed in liberalism and they believed in individualism. Okay, just basically basic ideas of modernity.
[snorts] And eventually the young Turks were able to overwhelm the Ottoman Empire and establish something called the Republic of Turkey which is still around today. So guys, the the we talk with Turkey. If you go to Turkey, it's a do that control Turkey. Okay. All right.
Um, so remember the do come from Zabai Zevi. They are cryptojews. They pretend to be Muslim, but they're in fact Jews. And these three do uh will help to found the Republic of Turkey. And they still control Turkey.
Together. Okay, so that's an example of an alliance between the 17 something fraus and the British Empire. Another example of an alliance is of course the Rothschild banking dynasty. This is Jacob Rothschild with King Charles of England. And this alliance goes back hundreds of years.
And um the Rothschild family um is of course one of the most powerful banking families in the world. So there's a story of how they got rich. In um 1815 Napoleon and the British fought the battle of Waterloo and this would determine who controlled Europe. the in the battle, the British and the Germans together were able to defeat the French. When this news happened, an agent of the Rothschild got into a Corvette, which is a fast boat, and they sailed all the way back to London to tell the Rothschild the news.
The Rothschild controlled the media at that point. And so the the media told everyone, "Oh my god, we lost the battle of Wateroo." So, as you can imagine, people start to panic. There was a stock market crash. and then the Rothschild bought up all the assets. That's how they became extremely wealthy.
And this is a strategy that they continue to use throughout their history. Okay. So, um where the 17 Frank is and where the British Empire clamped the most was in philosophy, developing a understanding the world that allowed them to amass more power. Okay. So, let's go over quickly over some basic British philosophy.
So British philosophy at this time was controlled by Freemasons. We'll discuss the Freemasons more next class. Okay. But the main purpose was to really deny God and truth and there were three major strands of this philosophy. Okay.
The first major strand is what called empirism and the most famous proponent of this is John Lock. John argue that we are born with a tablo rasa a blank mind okay a blank slate and so whatever information comes into us is through experience only through experience okay not through reasoning not not because of god not because of imagination or inspiration not because of divine spark in us but through just experience and only experience okay David Hume proposed a new idea called skepticism and he goes even further than John lock John lock says that We experience the world and that's how we know the world. Now the entire basis of science is the idea called induction. If I see a white swan a thousand times, I can then infer that all swans are white. Okay, this idea of induction, this is what underlies process.
Well, the idea of induction, you can never access truth. And what David Hume says is induction does not work. You cannot prove that just because you've never seen a black swan, black swans don't exist. Okay? You could have seen 10 million white swans does not prove that all swans are white and can only be white.
And he's right because there are black swans. Okay? So what what he's saying is the very project of truth seeeking, the very project of epistemmonology of philosophy, it's all nonsense. Not only that, but we don't really know things. All we do is remember things.
Okay? So when we say that Rome is a capital of Italy, we think we know it, but we don't we don't know it. It's all just convention. It's all just we agree to call a place in Italy Rome. We agree that that's a capital.
Okay, it's all disagreement. But there's no basis for truth here. All right. So now this this raises the problem of okay, if God doesn't exist, if truth doesn't exist, if there's no way for us to reach truth, if there's if there's no way for us to discover truth, then what can we do? And so uh Jerry Bentham proposed the idea of utilitarianism.
The way we understand the world is just through utility. If it is good for the majority of people, then it must be good. If it causes pleasure for the majority of people, then that policy must be good. If people want to eat candy all the time and makes them feel happy, then we should allow them to eat candy and that is inherently good. Okay?
And then what his disciple John Su Mill will do is he'll take the basis of this idea of utility as a as a basis of good and evil to create liberalism. Okay. So the very idea of liberalism today is based on utilitarianism. So for example homosexuality. Why is homosexually homosexuality good?
Because first of all homosexuals want to be homosexuals. Okay? You force them not to be homosexuals they'll feel bad. But also what's more important is they're not doing any harm to anyone, right? So if you just do the mathematics and you recognize that allowing homosexuality is a is a positive and that positive and brings more pleasure to the world, then you should allow it.
Okay? And this religious talk of it goes against the will of God, it's against the Bible, it's just it's just nonsense. We should just focus on first principles and just focus on utility. Does it bring benefit to people? And this is the very basis of um British British British philosophy.
And as you can as you can appreciate this align very much with the 17 Frank's idea of the world, right? All right. So this is John Mill and this is Jeremy Banam. Okay. And not only that, but once this philosophy is in place, they are now going to promote certain scientists that um um agree with this philosophy or or whose findings support this philosophy.
And the most famous of course is Charles Darin. Okay, Charles Darwin, right? When his book origin species came out, it was an instant bestseller. And within 20 years, it became the mainstream understanding of how we originated. Even though you actually read the book, even though you actually look at science, it's still very problematic.
All right. So, this is very strange how science is supposed to be a field of rigorous debate, rigorous science, right? But but the but the evidence supporting evolution is limited and again we discuss this all the time but it doesn't explain to us how we come to think right it explains to us how we got our bodies sure yeah from apes we get humans that makes sense but intellectually we're a lot more imaginative than apes how to explain that and he doesn't explain that okay and you're not even allowed to ask this question all All right. So, um, as this alliance between the seven Franks and the British Empire is growing, there are certain individuals that become um these meeting points of these two different groups. Okay.
So, so let's discuss two of them. The first is Benjamin Deseli. And he's important because he becomes the first and only Jewish prime minister of the British Empire. Okay. My second person is Leon the Rothschild who is here to the Rothschild begging family.
They're best friends and you can argue the Rothschild begging family finance uh Benjamin Draeli's uh banking career. Okay. And um in 1844 Benjamin Desi will publish a book called Conan Conins. It's a novel. Okay.
It's not a memoir but it's a novel. But if you read it, people will say that the characters are very much based on people that this Israeli knows. And this really is very explicit in telling us why he wrote the book. And the idea is to tell the British people more about Jews because Jews right now in history in Britain, they're an exotic species. And it's also to establish how Jews think.
Now, what's amazing about this um novel is that you read it and it's really strange, but it conforms to every single anti-semitic stereotype that we say today. Today, you say that Jews rule the world. You say that Jews work together, they conspire together, you say that Jews think that they're superior to everyone else, you are labeled as an anti-semit. Okay? But if you read this novel and we'll read this down together, this is exactly what bed Israeli says, okay, about the Jewish people.
All right, so uh let's let's read it together. Okay, so Emmer, can you can you read please? This is the introduction to uh the book Connor speak. Okay, in asserting the paramount character of the eistle keep going. Okay.
Uh polity and the ma majesty of the theocratic principle. It became necessary to ascend to the origin of the Christian church and to meet in a spirit worthy of a critical and comparatively enlightened age. The position of the descendants of that race who were the founders of Christianity. The modern Jews had long labored under the odium and stigma of medieval meal. What we're saying is this um Christianity is a great religion but it's important that we look at the origins of Christianity and who found Christianity okay which is a Jews we know we know it's a Jews who create Christianity okay keep on going in the dark ages when history was unknown the passions of societies undisturbed by tra tradition [sighs and gasps] traditionary experience were strong and their convictions um mitigated by criticism were necessarily fanatical So during the dark ages, everyone was just stupid.
Okay, keep on going. [laughter] The Jews were looked upon in the Middle Ages as an a cursed race, the enemies of God and man, the special foes of Christianity. No one in those days paused to reflect that Christianity was founded by the Jews, that its divine author in his human capacity was a descendant of King David. Wait, divine author of course is Jesus. Okay.
That his doctrines a vowedly were the completion not the change of Judaism. That the apostles and the evangelists who names men daily invoked and whose volumes they embraced with reverence were all Jews. That the infallible throne of Rome itself was established by a Jew. And that a Jew was the founder of the Christian churches of Asia. So this really is not just saying that Jews are important, but he's also saying that Jews are superior because they're the ones who created Christianity.
And what what he will say later on is Jews created everything because Jews are the most intellectually creative people in the world. Okay. And remember, this really is a Jew and he's one of the Jewish elite. Okay. All right.
Let's keep on going. All right. So in the novel, the major character is Adidonia, who is a wealthy Jewish person based on the Rothschild family. Okay. And he's going to explain to us how Jews control the world.
All right. Can you read Alan? Yeah. Okay. Sedonia.
Sedonia was descended from a very Asian and noble family of arrogant. Okay. Aragon is in Spain. Okay. So we discussed how before 100 years the Jews were part of uh the Spanish Muslim Empire but when they were reconquered they were forced to leave or convert going that in the course of ages had had given to the state many distinguished citizens in the priesthood its member had been precar precoliately eminent besides several prelades they counted among their numbers and ar Arkbishop of Toato and Sidonia in a season of great danger and different diff different difficulty difficulty had exercised for a series of years the paramount office of grand inquisitor.
Okay. So even after the Christians reconquered Spain and after some Jews converted to Catholism. Okay. First of all these Jews kept their faith secret. So even though on the outside they were Catholics, in the inside they were still Jews.
Okay, they were crypto Jews. But much more importantly, these Jews rose to supreme power within the Catholic Church in Spain. The irony is that the Spanish the Spanish Inquisition where Catholics were looking for Jews who were pretending to be Christians, the leadership were Jews. The leadership were crypto Jews. Okay, this is this is what this really saying.
I'm not saying this is true, but this is what this really is saying. Okay, uh keep on going. Yet strange at it may sound, it is nevertheless a fact of which there is no lack of evidence that these ill illustrious family during all these period in common with twoird of the uh aren arang uh nobility secretly adhered to the Asian faith and ceremonies of their fathers. I believe in the unity of the god of senior seni and the rights and observances of the laws of Moses. Okay.
So guys, 23 of nobility in Spain were crypto Jews. Catholics disgu uh Jews disguised as Catholics. Okay. All right. So again, I'm not saying this is true, but it's striking and really strange that a Jewish man who's very powerful will become prime minister of England.
He's writing this stuff. Okay. He's putting the mouth in the put in the mouth of basically a rash child. Okay. Uh can you read Amber?
The Sedonius of Aragon were new Christians were nuvo Christianos Christristenos. Some of them no doubt were burned alive at the end of the 15th century under the system of to Quimada. Many of them doubtless were the San Bonito, but they kept their titles and estates and in time reached those great office uh offices to which we have referred. During the long disorders of the peninsula war when so many openings were offered to talent and so many opportunities seized by the adventurous ait of younger branch of this family made a large fortune by military contracts and supplying the comat commisserate of the different armies at the peace precient of the great financial future of Europe. confident in the fertility of his own gen genius in his original views of fiscal subjects and his knowledge of national resources.
Then Sedonia feeling that Madrid Madrid or even Katis could never be a base on which the monetary transactions of the world could be regulated resolved to immigrate to England with with which he had in the course of years formed considerable commercial connections. He arrived here after the peace of Paris with his large capital. He staked all he was worth on the waterl loan and the event made him one of the greatest capitalists in Europe. Okay. So these crypto Jews they had a lot of money but not only that but they have a lot they have an information network okay because they have relatives friends all throughout Europe and there are index to superior and so they know how history will develop and they see a great money making opportunity in war.
So when these wars come out, what these Jews do is they support both sides. So they have possibly lose and then they make a lot of money and then they figure out where it is in their most advantage to be. So they have actually no national loyalty. Don't see themselves as belonging to a certain group of people, a certain nation. They see themselves as first and foremost Jews.
Okay? So when the time presented itself properly, these Sedonians they will migrate, some of them, not all of them will migrate from Spain into continental Europe and up to England because they saw England as a future. And of course from England they will also migrate to the United States of America. Okay. Um Alan, can you read please?
The only human quality. Sorry. So the the the father goes to England and now he establishes the banking dynasty and his son will now inherit everything. Okay. And and so and so this is about the sun.
Keep on going. Yeah. The only human quality that interested Sidon Sidonia was in intellect her he cared not whence it came where it was to be found. Creed country class character in this respect were alike indifferent to him. Okay.
So again this is a very anti-semitic trope where Jews don't like the idea of nation or culture or religion. They like the idea of ideas. Okay. And one anti-semitic trope is that Jews have a conspiracy to degrade religion uh culture society nation state in order to advance their own interests. Okay.
The author, the artist, the man of science never appealed to him in vain. Often he anticipate their wrongs and wishes. He encouraged their society was as frank in his conversation as he was generous in his contributions. But the instant they ceased to be authors, artists or philosophers, and their communications arose from anything but the intellectual quality which had originally interest him. The moment they were rash enough to approach intim in intimacy and appeal to the sympathizing men instead of the congenial intelligence, he saw them no more.
Okay, so this is a really important idea where again this is propaganda for Jews, right? So this really is saying how great Jews are. Jews are intellectual. But you know what Hegel, Frederick Hegel will say is that without culture there can be no great ideas. Okay, ideas emerge from community, from culture, from belonging.
Okay, so think of uh Homer or Dante or even the Yahweh. Okay, if you if you think that you are intellectual above culture, above nation, above people, you will not produce great ideas. Okay, keep on going. It was not however intellect merily in these unquestionable shapes that commanded his notice. There was not an adventurer in Europe with whom he was not familiar.
No minister of state has such communication which secret agents and political spies as Sidonia. He held relations with all the clever outcasts of the world. The cat catalog of his acquaintance in the shape of Greeks am Marinians Moors secret Jews tartans geese geese seeds. Okay. All right.
That's fine. Okay. Look, the idea is that Jews are intern first and foremost international the cosmopolitan right and as a result what will happen is that over time because he is in contact with so many different groups he's so intellectual he's always reading his his history he comes convinced that the superior race the greatest race of humanity are the Jews why because unlike other races the Jews refuse refuse to intermar. They refuse to breed with other cultures. And so as so as a result, the Jews are first and foremost peer.
They are Aryan. Okay, this is really ironic again because the Nazis will use this idea 100 years later to justify the Holocaust. But at this time in history, uh the Jews think that they are the superior race because they are the most pure. Okay. So So this is all that is saying.
[snorts] All right. Can you read Amber? In this country, says Adidonius. So this country of course is England, right? Since the peace there has been an attempt to advocate a reconstruction of society on a purely rational basis.
The principle of utility has been powerfully developed. I speak not with lightness of the labors of the dis disciples of that school. I bow to intellect in every form and we should be grateful to any school of philosophers even if we disagree with them. Doubtly grateful in this country were for so long a period of our state statesmen were in so pit pitiable and a career of public intelligence. There has been attempt to reconstruct society on a basis of material motives and calculations.
Okay. So again this is the idea of utitarianism right? This is Jimmy Bentham, John Suit Mill. Keep on going. It has failed.
It must ultimately have failed under any circumstances. Its failure in an ancient and densely people kingdom was inevitable. How limited is human reason, the profoundest inquir inquirers are most conscious. We are not indebted to the reason of man for any of the great achievements which are the landmarks of human action and human progress. It was not reason to be besieged to Troy.
It was not reason that sent forth the sarin from the desert to conquer the world. Okay. So the Serakans are the Muslims. Okay. That inspired the crusades um that instituted the monastic orders.
It was not reason that produced the Jesuit Jesuits. Above above all, it was not reason that created the French Revolution. Men is only truly great when he acts from the passion. Never irresistible, but when he appe when he appeals to the imagination. Even Mormons counts more votaries than Benam.
And you think then that an imagination once subdued the state. Imagination may now save it. Man is made to adore and to obey. But if you will not command him, if you give him nothing to worship, he will fashion his own divinities and find a chieftain in his own passions. So um Sono is is emphasizing the limitations of British philosophy, right?
Law, hume, banan, they're all limited. And so what the British need is for the Jews with their imagination, with their religion to save the British, to lead the British, to guide the British. Okay? Does that make sense? So again, this is trying to establish Jewish supremacy.
Okay? All right. This is much too long. Okay? But what he's really saying is like, listen, we Jews, we want to be part of society.
We are naturally conservative but we also want to practice our religion. So if you at any point if you the British at any point try to restrain us, if you try to take away our religious rights, we will rebel against you. We are cohesive. We we will stand up for liberalism. We will stand up for secularism.
We will stand up for individualism because these three philosophies are what most protect us from religious overreach. Okay? Does that make sense? Okay. So that's that that's what he's saying.
So Alan, can you start here? You never observe. Yeah. You [snorts] never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews.
This is true. Okay guys, the secret intelligence agency of the Catholic Church were first Jews. This is true. Keep on going. That mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarmed Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews.
So the Jews are the agents of the Russian Empire. Right. The mighty revolution which is at th this moment preparing in Germany and which will be in fact a second and greater reformations and of which so little is at yet know in England is entirely developing under the an uh opaces opaces of Jews who almost monopolize the professional profession professorial chairs of Germany. Okay. So this doesn't happen yet.
Okay. He's saying this year 1844 he's saying like the revolution you will see later on in Germany we organized it man we Jews organized it why because we control themies we control the professorships of Germany you want keep on reading ner the founder of spiritual christ Christianity who and who is re regious professor of divinity in the university of Berlin as a Jew okay so keep on going okay we won't read it about how many professors are Jews okay do you understand now what's amazing is again this came out 1844 and 1848 there were revolutions throughout Europe throughout Germany. So how did the Israeli know about this? Well, possibly because the British were helping to finance all this right from the alliance between the British and the Frankus. All right.
Uh can you read Amber? Okay. From from from here. Okay. A few years back we were applied to by Russia.
Now there has been no friendship between the court of St. Petersburg and my family. It has Dutch connections which have generally supplied it and our representations in favor of the Polish Hebrews a numerous race but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes have not been very agreeable to the Cesar the SAR. Okay. So what he's saying is we're very rich and nation states come and look for us for money.
Okay. So Russia wants a loan from us. We said, "No, you mistreat the the Jews, so we're not going to give you any money." Okay. The Russians are notorious for being anti-semitic at this stage. Okay, keep on going.
However, circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs. The Romanovs are the controlling family of Russia and the Sidonians. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian minister of finance court count.
I beheld the son of a lethusian Jew. The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain. I resolved on repairing repairing to Spain from Russia. I traveled without intermission. I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spain minister Senor Mendes Sabul.
I beheld one like myself, the son of a Novo Cristiano, a Jew of Aragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the president of the French Council. I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshall, and and very appropriately so. For who should be military heroes, if not those who worship the Lord of hosts? And is salute a Hebrew?
Yes. And others of the French marshals. And the most famous, Masenna, for example, his real name was Manisa. Manessa. But to my anecdote, the consequence of our consult consultations was that some northern powers should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity.
We fixed on Prusia and Prussia and the president of council made an application to the Prussia Prussian minister who attended a few days after a conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see my dear Connor speak Connor speak Connor speak that the world is governed by very different personage from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. So it's Jews who control the world because only Jews get along together. Okay.
So if Jews didn't exist, the world couldn't get along, right? And Jews hide everywhere. And that's how the world works, guys. You think the person in charge is in charge, but actually it's a secret society of of Jews. Now, again, I'm not saying this is true.
I just found it really weird that Benjamin Israeli is writing about this, okay? And again, he's getting a lot of this information from the Rothschild banking family. So, the Rothschild, for whatever reason, think they control the world. Okay? So I don't go much into this in detail, but I will point out that there is evidence that this is true.
All right, so we're going to look at the communist revolution in Russia together. I also want to keep you in mind that I don't think this is true. Actually, there's evidence is true, but I do not think this is true. Why this really is writing about this, we will discuss next class, okay? But it's all part of a secret plan.
All right, but first let's look at the evidence that this may be true. Again, I'm not saying this is true, but there is evidence that this is true. Okay? And the main major piece of evidence is the communist revolution, the bullsh revolution 1917 that overthrew the uh government of Russia to create a communist government. All right, first let's talk about revolution.
There are four elements you need in order for a revolution to be successful. Okay, the first is you need a really charismatic leader. Second is you need a broad mass appeal usually land for the peasants freeing debt okay and end of war peace then you need organizational discipline everyone has to get along okay has to be a cohesive group the last element of course is you need incompetent opposition your enemies a okay and of course the classic example of this is maong versus Changai. Okay. Minon was a charismatic leader who had a very strong organization and checked even though he had a huge army even though he had the American army.
Even though he had all sorts of benefits, he was a Okay. And that's why he lost. [snorts] All right. So the same is true for the Russian Revolution. This is Valer Lenin.
He's not charismatic, but he is extremely focused. He's fanatical. And um this is Leonki who is very charismatic. He's a very he's a great speaker and he's a Jew. Okay.
So I will point out that in 1917 he helped lead the revolution. But before that he was actually the United States. He had an apartment in New York City paid for by wealthy Jewish bankers. His uncle is a very wealthy Jewish industrialist in Ukraine. Okay.
So, he's part of this transnational capital network and even though he himself is a revolutionary, he hates capitalism. If someone gives you money, you cannot help but be influenced by that person. Okay? That's just a reality. [snorts] All right?
So um October 1917 is when the bullshiks uh launched a revolution and they seized power and then a month later they organized um an election and as you can see they are actually not that they are not the most popular party in Russia. Um they only have about 23% of the votes. The socialist revolutionaries actually have much more popularity than they do. They have 37%. And then you have all these different groups.
the Ukrainians, the cadets who are liberals, dimensions, um the Kosaks. So at this point in history, Russia is divided into so many different groups. You have different ethnicities, you have different political programs, you have um different orientations. Okay? And this is what will launch the great civil war.
Okay? And at this time in history, remember the bullshiks only control a certain part of Russia. They are the official government, but they only control a small part. and the white army who are the which combination of the liberals and monarchists they have much more stronger military and also at the same time you have all these different ethnic groups the Ukrainians rebelling against the boss including the Polish but over the next 5 years slowly the bull blevik will obtain absolute power and so the question is how do they do that well the first tool is terror. Okay, this this is called the red terror where they went around and killed anyone who opposed them.
Now, what you don't understand is there's actually a strategy behind the red terror. The the very idea is to steal as much money as possible from wealthy people. Okay? So, you're an aristocrat. You have a lot of wealth hidden.
I need your money. So you either give me your money or I will kill your daughter and I will kill your son and I will then I will kill your wife. Okay? So it's your choice. Give me all your money or I'll kill everyone in your family.
So the Bullshiks were fanatical about this and that's why they won the war. [snorts] Leon Trosky organized the red army in um the war against the white army. Okay. They also the greens which were these peasants. So there's a lot so the Bushiks were far behind.
So, how did the Bullshiks, the Red Army, win the war? Well, guys, they had a lot of help. Okay, they had a lot of mercenaries coming to the country, tens of thousands of mercenaries to help them, especially uh the Chinese mercenaries, the Latvians, the Hungrians. Okay, why? How did they get all this money?
Transnational capital. Wall Street and City of London were bankrolling the Soviets. Why were they doing that? [snorts] Also we have to remember that at this time in history during the revolution Britain and France, United States, Japan sent armies into Russia. Now what you learn in class is oh it's because they are capitalists and they fear the communists and that's why they sent armies to try to uh uh reduce the threat.
That's not true guys. Why is it the armies is because the Bolsheviks reigned on debt. Okay, Russia owed a lot of money to Britain, Japan, United States and France. And so these armies were sent in order to threaten the Bviks. So what the Bik Bixs did was they stole as much money as they could from the peasants, from nobility, from the treasury and pay off these armies.
And then these armies helped them in the war against the uh the whites. Okay. Does that make sense? Okay. All right.
So, let's summarize what what we've just learned. Now, what you're taught in history class is American Britain needs Russia in war against Germany. And that's why and the Germans control the Bolshviks. And that's why Britain and uh America would not support the bullshiks. And the counter argument is no, it's transnational capital that has influence over Anglo-American foreign policy.
Okay, do you understand? Anglo-American foreign policy. It's not to serve national interests. It's not it's to serve private capital. Okay, that's the first point.
Second point is the Bviks are communists and so they're a threat to capitalism. And the kind argument is actually transnational capital cares about profit. They don't care about ideology. All right. What drives them is money not ideas.
The third argument is the most hated imperialism and capitalism. So they would refuse to work with Wall Street and the city of London. And the kind of argument of is that they believe that the ends justify the means. We just have to like do what we need in order to obtain power. Then we can create our socialist paradise.
Okay. All right. All right. So, uh, this is a book called Wall Street and the Russian Revolution. A story by Rich by the name of Richard Spence.
He spent a lot of time collecting documents that show that in fact transational capital were helping the bullshiks win power in Russia. Why? Because they believed in the bullshiks? No. Because transial capital first and foremost steals.
You understand? They like revolution because revolution is opportunity to steal as much as you can. Okay. You can buy things really cheaply during a revolution. And this this is his argument.
All right. So, let's read a couple passages from his book. So, uh Emma, can you read please? The pro bosic fashion faction on Wall Street had a most outspoken pitchmen in the aforementioned William Boyce Thompson. Departing Petrograde, he arrived back in the states on Christmas Day in 1917.
On 18th January, he sat for an interview with a representative of Do Jones and published in the Wall Street Journal. Wall Street Journal of course is the newspaper of the of Wall Street. boy. Despite the fact that Bolshvix uh had proclaimed an army army on the Eastern front and open peace negotiations with Berlin, Thompson insisted that the Russians would never conclude a separate peace. Okay, so he's just lying to people.
Okay, the Bikes want peace with Germany. They promise peace to the people. That's why they're popular. And these Wall Street bankers are just lying to American people. Okay, keep on going.
He pooed pooed reports that there was anarchy in Russia and said that the Russian people were trying to adopt socialism as the basis of their government. If they were allowed to succeed, an extremely democratic, well-managed country will emerge. In other words, an excellent business environment. So, what the basically did was they took all the gold they had to bribe Wall Street so that Wall Street would go and brainwash American people. Okay.
That's that's the strategy here. All right. Um, can you read, Alan? Yeah, for those on Wall Street and elsewhere who dreamed of putting the brakes on Russia's economic development and seeing its reaches and resources up for grabs under the regime willing to sell anything that dreams had basically come true. Okay, so it's really important to understand the British Empire was fighting a war against Germany.
Russia was an important ally, right? They didn't care because for Britain they want to destroy everyone. Okay. So that's why they support the Russian revolution because they know they knew the boss would destroy the Russian economy. So keep on going.
Yeah. From 1918 through early 1921, Bri war commun communism reduced Russian to an econ economic based on barter and robbery. Besides the abolition of private trade and the destruction of the monetary system, the rare regime embarked on a massive looting campaign, reanking rents palaces, bank vaults, churches, and museums. They expropriate every volume valuable they could get their hands on and stash it all in a new state treasury. By the close of 1921, an estimate $450 million dollars in valuable had been sequestered u sequested sequested there with more to come.
Much of it does not disting to be fenced abroad for a fraction of its value in capital capitalist hard currency. So this is how empire works guys, okay? They destroy nations in order to steal as much as they can. What happens afterwards? They don't care.
All right. It's that simple. All right. Okay. So, after the Bolsheviks consolidate power, after the win civil war, everyone assumes that Trosky would be the new leader.
But it's Stalin that becomes the new leader. Okay. Why? Because after the war ends, there's expectation among the bullshiks. know we help the transational capital so much they're going to help us rebuild our nation.
Okay, they're going to give us loans. They will give us technology to help us rebuild Russia. And guess what happened? National Capital says, "No, you guys are good. We're good.
We we made our money." Okay? And so now what's happening is that Leontrosky, who is a Jew, he gets blamed, right? Because Leontrosky is the one who brought in transational capital. He's the one who facilitated this exchange. And now the is thinking, "Oh, this is Jewish conspiracy.
You Jews were planning this all along to steal everything from us and then screw us over in the end." Okay, that's why Stalin won. All right, so let's go over the difference between Leon Trosky and Joseph Stalin. Leon Trosky did not work for transnational capital. Okay, he was first and foremost a revolutionary who was interested in global revolution. He had a he had a mess calling to transform and save the world.
Um but he was accused of being transational capital and because he was a Jew that just assumed that he was a spy. Okay. And um he also had a personality which was arrogant and aloof. Stalin had his own issues. Okay.
But he benefited from the fact that Trosky was a Jew and he was able to slowly amass power for himself. He also has a background as a police informant but um but being a spy for the capitalist was a much worse crime. All right. And that's why Joseph Stalin uh won in the end and this is terrible for the Jews the BI Jews who believed in the revolution because they all got killed by Joseph Stalin. Okay.
Leoni was killed along with his with all his children. [snorts] All right. So it's not just that transational capital supported the bullshiks, they also supported Carl Marx. Okay. All right.
So Karl Marx has an interesting background. He actually comes from a uh many generations of rabbis. So he's basically a Jewish aristocrat and he was German, but then he moved to England and he wrote many letters, wrote many books to promote communism. These books aren't going to sell well. So he was poor all his life.
But what's interesting is he lived a very nice life. Okay, he he lived in England and he lived a basic middle class life. So where did he get all his money from? Well, he got he got all his money from Frederick Engles who was a friend of his and whose father was an industrialist. Okay, a Jewish industrialist.
So why would a Jewish capitalist support Carl Marx? And the answer is because communism benefits transnational capital. Okay. So um why why would it benefit transational capital? All right.
Uh can can you read Amber? So this is a letter written by Carl Marx. Okay. [snorts and clears throat] For as soon as the distribution of labor comes into being each man has a particular exclusive sphere of activity which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman or crit a critical critic and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood.
While in communist society where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rare cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner and uh and as I have a mind without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, horsemen or critic. Okay. So the problem with capitalism is that it degrades our individuality. We as individuals want freedom to enjoy ourselves. Right?
This is a very frankus idea, right? We want to enjoy ourselves. We want to be free to enjoy the pleasures of life. The problem of capitalism is the idea of specialization, right? Where you're forced to do one thing, one thing only according to the needs of the capitalist.
Okay. Uh can you keep on reading, Amber? Okay. Supposing that we had produced in a human manner in his production each of us would have doubtly affirmed himself and his fellow men. I would have objectified in my production my individuality and its peculiarity and would thus have enjoyed in my activity and individual expression of my life and would have also had in looking at the object the individual pleasure of realizing that my personality was subjective, visible to the senses and therefore a power raised beyond all doubt.
Okay. So what what he's saying here is that before each of us were crafts people. So I might make a vase. Okay. And when I make a vase then this vase is a expression of my individuality expression of my creativity.
And by looking at this vase it becomes an objective symbol of my existence. I can look at this vase and my own individual individ individuality will be reflected back to at me. Okay, keep on going. In your enjoyment or use of my product, I would have had the direct enjoyment of realizing that by my work I had both satisfied a human need and also objectified the human essence and therefore fashioned for another human being the object that met his need. Then I give you this vase to a friend and I see this vase at the friend's home, right?
He puts flowers and he's very happy with this vase and then I I can see my impact in the world. All right. Uh, keep on reading. Amber, I would have been for you the mediator between you and the species and thus between and thus been felt by you and acknowledged as a completion of your own essence and a necessary part of yourself and I would thereby have realized that I was confirmed both in your thought and in your love. Okay.
So this vase now shapes your reality and I know that this vase has given you meaning and it has shaped your reality and therefore I find meaning in that. Okay. Again this is a very Frankish attitude right where you can project your imagination onto people and it can shape the way he or she sees reality. Okay. This is a very similar concept.
Do you want in my expression of my life I would have fashioned your expression of your life and thus in my own activity I have realized my own essence my human communal essence okay right so again this is something that sounds perfectly correct right and the reason why it sounds correct to us is because it becomes a basis for our society okay the idea of individ individualism the idea of materialism okay keep on going in such a situation our products would be like so many mirrors. Each one reflecting on our essence thus in this relationship what occurred on my side would also occur on yours. Okay, so this is a really important metaphor. Okay, he's saying that objects become mirrors where we can see our own individuality reflected. Okay, and this goes against the religious concept where our humanity is all reflected in each of us.
Okay. So, so what he's doing is creating a material outlook. Does that make sense? He's denying the existence of God. He's he's denying the existence of spirituality, but he's taking the concept of religion and applying to a material world, right?
He recognizes that we have these spiritual religious needs. And what he's saying is that we don't need God to achieve these needs. We can we can have materialism achieve these needs. Okay? Which again is a very Frankish concept.
Keep on going. My work would be a free expression of my life and therefore a free enjoyment of my life. In work, the peculiarity of my individuality would have been affirmed since it is my individual life. Work would thus be genuine active property presupposing private property and my my individuality is so far externalized that I hate my activity. It is a torment to me and only the appearance of an activity and thus also merely a force activity that is laid upon me through an external arbitrary need not an inner and necessary one.
Right? So why would transnational capital support this idea? The reason why is that before the debate was mind versus matter, right? What what matters more the spirit or the flesh? And what Marx is saying is no what matters what the debate the dialectic is between private property versus public property in private property I have to work for someone else in public property I work for myself that's the question that's the debate that's the dialectic okay and so what by doing this it's a very clever trick that trans capital uses by making us think that the only thing that matters is private versus public as opposed to mind versus matter.
Okay, that's the goal of communism. That's why trans capitalist support idea because it advances the goal of empire which is turn us all into slaves. Okay, does that make sense? All right. [snorts] All right.
So Markx is correct in analyzing the problems of capitalism. Okay. But his problem is that he believes the solution is to make capital public and as a result this will create a workers's paradise. But there are problems with this. Okay.
So let's go over some of the problems. Okay. Markx believes that history is linear progress. So capitalism will lead to socialism which will lead to communism. It is a linear progress.
Okay. Second is a problem that history is theological, meaning things go the way they should. Markx also believes that what matters is class struggle between the rich and the poor as opposed to uh between spirit and flesh. Okay. Now, the last thing that's that's most problematic is Marx believes you need a vanguard in order to lead the politarian into a socialist paradise.
you need an elite in order to um lead us into paradise. And this estology is all Frankish, right? This is something that we learned last class. This is something that Frank proposed where um his group is a new people which will lead people into a material paradise. Right?
[snorts] So all Marx is doing is taking Jacob Frank's ideas and systemizing it. Now I'm not saying that Marx was a Frankus. He's probably not a Frankus. But what I'm saying is that there are people around him like Frederick Engles who could have been a Frankus and as such and they used their money to influence Marx in a way. Okay.
And we kn and I we can suspect this because there's some ideas that don't make sense. If you are a socialist, you believe in democracy. But Marx believed in a dictatorship. Okay, that makes no sense. All right.
So, um this is Muel Buchanan and he was a socialist. He was an anarchist. And he believes uh he agrees with most of Mark's analysis, but where they disagree is this. Markx believed you need a vanguard. Okay?
Like critical Frank believed. But Bennon says, "No, no, no. If you're a vanguard, they'll just become a new capitalist class. Okay? What's the difference, man?
If you are a socialist, you have to believe in democracy. You have to believe that everyone has capacity to make his or her decisions. And that has that must be the basis of your new society. Otherwise, we're just going to go back to the way things are before. Okay?
It'll just it'll just be another empire. Before it's a British Empire, now it's a Russian Empire. Who cares? What's the difference? All right.
So, let let's read some. Okay. All right. Can you read Amber? As for us, we want neither phantoms nor nothingness, but living human reality.
And we recognize that man can feel free, be free, and therefore can achieve freedom. In order to be free, I need to see myself surrounded by free men, and be recognized as such by them. I am free only when my individuality reflected in the mirror of the equally free consciousness of every individual around me comes back to me strengthened by everyone's recognition. Okay, so this is really important. Okay, this may seem the same as Marks, but really they're saying different things.
Mark says no, the object is a reflection. And what we kind of say, no, no, no, the other person is a reflection. Okay. And this goes back to Dante Zorusra Jesus the divine spark in us and we love someone else. When we care about someone else, our divine spark is reflected in that person's divine spark as well.
Okay. And the object gets in the way. That is a crucial distinction. Do you understand? Okay.
It sounds the same, but these are two radically opposing ideas where Mark says, "No, it's the object that matters. As long as the object is created by yourself freely then that is good. And what we kind of says no no what matters is our relationship with each other. Okay we don't need the object. Okay.
The freedom of every other individual does not limit my own as the individualists claim. On the contrary, it is the confirmation, realization and human dignity of all persons to see and feel my freedom confirmed, sanctioned and boundlessly expanded by universal agreement is happiness. It is human paradise on earth. How you create paradise is through love. Okay, you understand?
Not through objects, not through public property, not through socialism, but through love. Okay, the problem with Markx is he focus on the individual. what makes the individual happy and what kind of says is that's stupid. You have to focus on what makes a community happy because it's only through food happiness of others can we ourselves be happy. Okay, this is something that Jesus said Zorusta Dante.
Okay, this is what makes logical sense and Mars is not a dumb guy. Okay, he's a really smart person but he says something opposite which suggests to us that he is being influenced by an outside force. Okay. He himself would not come to the conclusion that he himself would not come to the conclusion that you need a vanguard to lead the uh the workers. All right.
Can you keep on reading? Amber available to everyone will be a general scientific education especially the learning of the scientific method, the habit of correct thinking, the ability to generalize from facts and make more or less correct deductions. But of encyclopedic minds and advanced so sociologists there will be very few. It would be sad for mankind if at any time theoretical speculation became the only source of guidance for society. If science alone were in charge of all social administration.
Life would wither and human society would turn into a voiceless and surv. The domination of life by science can have no other result than the brutalization of mankind. Okay. So what he's saying is this the ultimate project of Marxism when you have something elite a vanguard in charge when this is no different by the way from trans national capital or the British Empire okay it would lead to slavery all right and quite honestly he was right all right let's look at Simon Freud okay Sigman Freud like Marx is also extremely influential um He practiced medicine in Vienna. He was a psychologist.
And so there were a lot of young women who came to him as patients. And for would ask them, "What's wrong with you?" And the woman would say, "I'm hysterical." Okay? And at that time, hysterical just meant that um depressed or anxious. I can't control my emotions. If a man talks to me, I like I I I stutter and I I I run away.
Okay? And I can't have personal relationships. I can't sleep. I'm sweating. I'm anxious.
And then for of course would ask him would ask them why is this happening to you to you? Okay. And then the woman would say because when I was younger when I was a little girl my father raped me. Okay. Incest.
That's why this happened to me. And then Freud's like, "Wow, this sounds really strange." But then he looked at at the literature. He talked to many patients and he recognized that everyone was telling him the same thing. And it's true. I mean it's just pure um logic right if you are abused as a young girl by your father you have a lot of social problems when you get older okay especially with men and so he he collects all this research and he published a paper which is very good called the ideology of hysteria and so uh Emma can you can you read please above all my previously communicated assumption that trauma specifically sexual trauma cannot be stressed of as a path a p pathogenic agent was confirmed a new even children of respected high-minded puritanical families fall victim to real rape much more frequently than other had dared to suspect okay so this is what he's saying is this rape is a really common phenomenon especially among higher society okay keep on going either their parents themselves seek substitution for their lack of sexual satisfaction in this pathological manner or else trusted persons such as relatives, uncles, aunts, grandparents, tutors, servants, abuse, ignorance and innocence of children.
The obvious objection that we are dealing with sexual fantasies of the of the child himself that is with historical lies unfortunately is weakened by the multitude of confessions of this kind on the part of patients in analysis to assaults on children. Okay. So what he's saying is first of all rape is very common and these children are saying the same thing. Okay, keep on going. If you try in a uh an approximately similar way to induce the symptoms of hysteria to make themselves heard as witnesses to the history of the origin of the illness, we must take our start from Joseph Brewer's momentous discovery.
The symptoms of hysteria apart from the stigmata are determined by certain experiences of the patients which have operated in a traumatic fashion and which are being rep reproduced in his uh psych psychical psychical life in the form of mimic symbols. Okay. So this is the ideas are simple. Okay. These women when they're being historical, when they're being anxious, depressed, it's because they suffered real trauma when they were younger, they're not making this up, okay?
They're not imagining this because a lot of people are accusing them like you're just fantasizing this. Okay? And they say, "No, no, no. The science tells us, the research tells us you can only have these symptoms if you yourself experience it." Okay? You cannot imagine a leg injury.
It has you have to be hit by a car to have a leg injury. And and this is what he's saying. You have to be raped by your father or a trusted friend or a relative in order to have these symptoms. Otherwise, they can't exist. Okay.
All right. Keep on going. All right. So, this is a book by Jeffrey Mason. Okay.
And and he was for the longest time an um follower of Freud. Okay. um Freud was dead but he himself looked at Freud's personal letters and what he discovered was there's a sharp break okay and early Freud was very scientific he believed the woman uh who are his patients but then later on for a reason he changes everything okay so so so can can you keep on reading Amber I therefore put forward the thesis that at the bottom of every case wisteria there are one or more occurrences of premature sexual experience occurrences which belong to the earliest years of childhood but which can be reproduced through the work of psychoanalysis in spite of the intervening decades okay so again he's writing these letters to his friends and he's saying very clearly I am certain 100% certain that if these women are suffering from depression or anxiety it must be because of sexual abuse at an earlier age and when I talk to them I can reconstruct the experience. Okay? Because even though they're traumatized, the memory is still there.
So through talk therapy, I can slowly reconstruct the experience and this will help them heal. Okay? And this is true. If the if the women are able to reconstruct this experience and they feel as though someone believes them, advocates for them, they will feel much more safe about the world. Okay?
So this is true. This is very simple. Okay? Keep on going. There are however a whole number of other things that vouch for the reality of infantile sexual scenes.
In the first place there is the uniformity which they exhibit in certain details which is a necessary consequence if the preconditions of these experiences are always of the same kind but which would otherwise lead us to believe that there were secret understandings between the various patients. Okay. So, what he's saying is, is it possible there's conspiracy among these patients? Um, possibly. But they're telling me they're giving me like these details and these details make a lot of sense.
Okay? So, he doesn't believe it's a conspiracy, but he does not discount the possibility of a conspiracy because he's a scientist. He wants to be rigorous. He wants to be um absolutely certain. Okay?
Keep on going. In the second place, patients sometimes describe as harmless events whose significance they obviously do not understand since they would be bound otherwise to be horrified by them or again they mention details without laying any stress on them which only someone of experience in life can understand and appreciate as subtle traits of reality. Okay. So he he says that one thing about this trauma is this disassociation. Okay.
So these patients will reveal details that would shock anyone else but she says it indifferently which means that she was disassociated from the experience when it happened. So just by telling that person you're able to reconstruct the experience itself. Right? Does that make sense? All right.
Okay. It is less easy to refute the idea that the doctor forces a reminiscence of this word on the patient that he influences him by suggestion to imagine and reproduce them. Nevertheless, it appears to me equally untenable. I have never yet succeeded in forcing on a patient a scene I was expecting to find in such a way that he seemed to be living through it with all the appropriate feelings. Perhaps other may be more successful in this.
So one major objection is is it possible you are you are implanting false memories in your patient and what he's saying is okay well I've tried this and it doesn't work and maybe others and he he doesn't deny that it's possible okay but he's saying like I myself have tried this and it has not worked so he's being a very rigorous scientist right he's looking at all different possibilities and he's discovering that no um there's only one possibility which is like they are telling the truth. So he's advocating for his patients. Okay. The problem though of course is that the fathers who are doing this are extremely powerful men. These are Frank.
Okay. Remember Frankus practice um uh father daughter incest. Okay. Understand? Okay.
that Franks are very powerful people especially in Vienna and this is part of their religion. If you do it over generations, it just becomes multigenerational trauma. You just do it because it's you're addicted to it. Okay. And this is screwing up a lot of these young women.
It's making them miserable. Uh yeah. Uh so you mentioned that this kind of rape is frequently occurred in upper class. Why does it not so frequently in the lower class? Um, you know what?
That's a good question. Okay. And the answer is, um, if you are an upper class woman, you're much more likely to report this than if you are from the lower class. So, I'm not we're not saying that this occurs only among the rich. It could also occur among the poor.
But it's the rich who have money to send their daughters to psych psych to psychiatrists. Okay? The rich are educated and therefore they will report this. They understand this is a bad thing. Okay.
So we don't have evidence to suggest that this is more common among rich. Okay. But what this is telling us is that among Frank is this is very common. All right. All right.
So after this happens after Freud is reporting this and the Frankus are getting angry at him. What happens now is an alliance between Freud and the Frankus. In fact, you could argue that Freud now joins a fractus. And so now what we'll see is a radical change in how Freud perceives these patients. Okay.
So, Emma, can you read please? Since childhood masturbation is such a general occurrence and is at the same time so poorly remembered, it must have an equivalent in psychic life. And in fact, it is found in the fantasy encountered in most female patients. Okay. namely that namely that the father seduced her in childhood.
This is the later reworking which is designed to cover up the recollection of infantile sexual activity and represents an excuse and an extinuation thereof. The grain of truth contained in this fantasy lies in the fact that the father by way of his innocent car caress in earliest childhood has actually awakened the little girl's sexuality. The same thing applies to the little boy and his mother. It is these same affectionate fathers that are the ones who then endeavored to break the child of the habit of masturbation of which they themselves had by the that time become the unwitting cause and thus the motives mingle in the most successful fashion to form this fantasy which often dominates a woman's entire life. seduction fantasy.
One part truth, one part gratification of love, and one part revenge. Okay, so now this is like really weird. Okay, what what he's saying is these young girls, these young boys, they want to have sex. They they're they're like sexually obsessed. And whenever a father kisses them, which the father wants to do, they think this is this is going to lead to sex.
But the father recoils at that possibility. And now the young girl feels rejected. But she has all these sexual desires. So she masturbates, but while she's masturbating, she feels anger and guilt at her father. Therefore, she makes up these sexual fantasies that the father is raping him.
And that's why and she's determined that the world know this. That's that's how angry he she is at him. Okay, this is complete nonsense. But guess what guys? This becomes standard mainstream academic knowledge taught in schools and universities for many decades.
Okay, this is called the edifo complex. That's that's a complex. Have you guys studied this? Yeah. It's complete utter nonsense.
Agree. Right. Can you keep on reading, Amber? The motives. The motives for illness often begin to stir in childhood.
The love hungry little girl unhappy at having to share her parents' affection with her brothers and sisters, realizes that all that tenderness comes flowing back when her parents are made anxious by her illness. The girl now knows a way of calling forth her parents' love and will use this as soon as as she has at her disposal the psychical psychical material necessary to produce a morbid state. Once the child has become a woman and in contradiction of the demands of the childhood has married an inattentive man who suppresses her will unst uh unstintingly exploits her work and expends neither affection nor money upon her. Illness becomes the only weapon with which she can assert herself in life. It gives her the it gives her the rest she craves.
It force it forces the man to make uh to make sacrifices of money and care that he would not have made to the wealthy woman uh to the healthy woman and it requires him to treat her with care if she recovers because otherwise a relapse would be waiting in the wings. Her illness is apparently objective and involuntary as even her doctor will be obliged to testify and it enables her to employ without conscious self-reroach. this useful application of a means that she found effective during childhood. So why is woman being hysterical later in life? Because it allows them to control people.
Okay, it it draws attention to them. They want attention but also makes people obey her whims. Okay, this is gaslighting. All right, this is peer and other gaslighting. And the guys, this is what psychology is just peer and other gaslighting.
Okay. All right. Um the problem of course is how do you convince your patient that this is true and so he develops a mind control technique called dream analysis. Okay this is his book from the book interp interpretation of dreams. Okay and it's all just mind control crap where the patient is trying to recall dreams and you're brainwashing that patient.
Okay? Because if you've discussed memory that that the person like I know what I saw, right? But his dreams then you can implant false memories. Then you can make suggestions. You can hypnotize that person.
Okay? And so psychology becomes now mind control. Okay. So can you read? [snorts] I think everyone who occupies himself with dreams will recognize as a very common phenomenon that fact that a the fact that a dream will give proof of the knowledge and a recollection of matters of which the dreamer in his waking state did not imagine himself to be cog cognizant cognizant in my analytic investigations of the nervous patients of which I shall speak later.
I find that it happens many times every week that I am able to convince them from their dreams that they are perfectly well acquainted with quotations, obscene expressions, etc. Okay? So, do you understand? So, when when the person is talking about his dream, you can now make suggestions and that person will believe whatever crap you tell him. Okay?
And that's a secret of mind control. And guess what, guys? We still use this crap today. All right? All right.
So um Floyd is of course gaslighting everyone because he has to protect his patrons the Frankus and the Frankus will allow him to get very will become very famous. He'll get a lot of awards. When the Nazis come to power they he'll go to England where he's well treated. He joins the Royal Academy. Um the British protect him and the British will then spread his views.
Okay. He has a uh disciple Carl Young who will take his for ideas and turn it into a understanding a systematic understanding of how the mind works and from this will develop neuroscience. Okay. Um the problem with all this this is public problem with all this is asan tells us it's all selfdirected inwards which gives us nowhere. Okay.
It's just you looking into yourself. It's naval gazing and from that you learn no truth at all. But that's the entire basis of our society. And so um so yeah so this is so our so this um understanding of the mind becomes reflected in popular culture. Okay.
U back to Macan he tells us that to be truly free we all have to be free. We have to be free together. Okay. In each other we find meaning, purpose and love. Okay.
Not in oursel but in each other. That's a difference. And so this leads us to a question. Okay. And this is a question I don't know this today.
It's all speculation. The question I want to leave with with you today is is Marxism, liberalism, individualism, Darwinism, psychology ops meant to turn us into slaves? Okay, that's a question that you have to carry with you. I don't know the answer to I don't know the answer to to that. Okay, I'm just providing you with a theory and these connections we don't know how close they are.
Okay, it may it may not it may just be random coincidence. It could be cause and effect. We don't know. Okay, but this something that you will have to ask yourself as you continue your study. Okay, so this shows us in alliance between the Sabatine Franks and the British Empire.
And so next class will be our last class and in our last class we'll talk about the past Judea. Okay, which is a culmination of all these trends. All right, any questions, guys? Okay, great. So, I will see everyone next class.